DESIGNING ENGLISH TEST FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL



CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
The form of english for junior high school students now differs from the form of questions that existed ten years ago.  Both in terms of the type of questions that exist, upn to the way of assessment, now educational institutions with a curriculum that continues to be developed each year has a lot of consediration when composing english for students. With a continously updated curriculum from year to year, a variety of forms of english for junior high school students are being developed in order to achieve the existing educational standard. At the junior high school stage, the child is expected to have mastered the basics of english acquired in elementary school. Thus the problem form becomes more complex with full-length text filled and solid, and essay form exercises are introduced at this stage.
Variety of questions can provide more reliable test results. Thus the many problems of the english for junior high school students who are always developed useful not only to test, but also to produce a reliable value.
B. Formula of problem
            a. What is designing?
            b. What is the test?
            c. How to designing english test for junior high school?
C. Purpose
a. To know what is designing
            b. To know what is the test
            c. To know how to desgning english test for junior high school
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
A. Definition of designing
                Designing is the creation of a plan or convention for the construction of an object, system or measurable human interaction. Design has the different connotations in different fields. In some cases, the directs construction of an object ( as a pottery engineering, management, coding, and grafict design) as also considered to use design thinking.
            Designing often necessitates considering the aesthetic, functional, economic, sociopolitichal dimension of both design object and design process. It may involve considerable research, thought modeling, interactive adjustement, and re-design. Meanwhile, diverse kinds of objects maybe designed, including clothing, graphical user interfaces, products skyscrapers, corporate identifies bussiness processes and even methods or processes of designing.[1]     
B. Definition of the test
            Although some people  tempt to think of testing and assessment as synonymous terms, actually they are not. Assessment is  a systematic approach for collection information on student learning  or performances. Popham defines assessment in the context of education as a formal attempt to determine the status of the student with respect to various educational interest. Meanwhile, tests are prepared administrative procedures that occur at identifiable times in a curriculum when learner muster all their facilities to offer peak performance, knowing that their responses  are being measured and evaluated.[2]
A test or examinatioin (informally, exam or evaluation) is an assessment intended to measure a test-taker’s knowledge, skill, aptitude, physical fitness, or classification in many oder topics. A test maybe administered verbally on paper, on a computer, or in a confinent area that requires a test taker to physically perform a set of skills. Tests barry in style, rigor and requirements. For example, in closed book test taker is often required to rely upon memory to respond to specifict items whereas in an open book test, a test taker may used one or more supplementary tools such as reference book or calculator when responding to an item. A test maybe administered formally or informally an example of an informal test would be a reading test administered by a parent to a child. An example of a formal test would be a final examination administered by a teacher in a classroom or an IQ test adminitered by a psychologicst in a clinic, formal teasting often result in a grade or a test score.[3]
C. Designing English Test
            In this chapter the author will draw on those foundations and tools to begin the process of designing tests or revising existing tests. To start that process, the author need to ask some critical question.
1.      What is the purpose of the tests? Why am I creating this test or why was it created by someone else? For an evaluation of overall proficiency? To place student into a course? To measure achievement within a course once you have established the major purpose of a test, you can determine its objectives.
2.      What are the objectives of the test? What specifically am I trying to find out/ establishing of appropriate objectives involves a number of issues, ranging from relativelly simple ones about forms and function covered in a course unit to much more complex ones about constructs to be operationalized in the test included hetre are decisions about what language abilities are to be assessed.
3.      How will the test specifications reflect both the purpose and the objectives? To evaluate or design a test, you must make sure that the objectives are incorporated into structure that appropriatelly weights the various competencies being assessed.
4.      How will the test task be selected and the separate item arranged? The task that the test-takers must perform need to be practical in the ways defined in the previous chapter. They should also  achieve content validity by presenting tasks that morror those of the course being assessed. Further they should be able to be evaluated realibly by the teacher of scorer. The tasks themselves should-strive for authenticity, and the progression of task ought to be biased for best perfomance.
5.      What kind of scoring, grading, and/or feedback is expected? Test barry in the form and function of feedback, depending on their purpose. For every test, the way results are reported is an important consideration. Under some circumstances a letter grade or a holistic score may be appropriate othetr circum stances require taht a teacher offer substantive was back to the learner.[4]
D. Test types
1. Language Aptitude Test
            One type of test-although admittedly not a very common one-predicts a person success prior to exposure to the second language. a language aptitude test is designed to measure capasity or general ability to learn a foreign language and ultimate success in that undertaking. Language aptitude test are ostensibly designed to apply to the classroom learning any language.[5]
2. Proficiency Test
            If your aim is to test global competence in a language, then you are, in conventional terminology, testing proficiency. A proficiency test is not limited to any one course, curriculum, or single skill in the language, rather it tests overall ability. Proficiency test have traditionaly consisted of standarized multiple-choice item in grammar, vocabulary, reading comprehension, and aural comprehension. Sometimes a sample of writing is added, and more recent test also include oral production performance. As noted in the previous chapter, such test often have contents validiy meaknesses, but several decade of construct validation research have brought us much closer to constructing successfull communicative proficiency test.[6]
3. Placement Test
            Certain proficiency test can act in the role of placement test, thepurpuse of whish is to place a student into a particular level or section of a language curriculum or school. A placeement test usually, but not always includes a sampling of the material to be covered in the various courses in a curriculum, a students performance on the test should indicate the point at which the student will find material neither too easy nor too difficult but appropriately chalenging. [7]
4. Diagnostic Test
            A diagnostic test is designed to diagnose specified aspect of a language. A test in pronounciation, for example, might diagnose the phonological features of english that are difficult for learners and should therefore become part of a curriculum. Usually, such test offer checklist of features for the adminisstrator ( often the teacher) to use in pin pointing difficulties. A writing diagnostic word elicit a writing sample from students that word allow the tacher to identify those theoretical and linguisticts features on which the course needed to focus special attention.[8]
5. Achievement Test
            Achievement test are often summative because they are administered at the end of a unit or term of study. Theyb also paly an important formative role. An effective achievement test will offer washback about the quality of a learners performance in subsets of the unit of course. This washback contributes to the formative nature of such test.[9]
E. Some Practical Steps To Test Construction
a. Objective Assessing Clear, Unambiguous
In addition to knowing the purpose of the test you are creating, you need to know as specially as possible what it is you want to test. Sometimes teacher give tests simply because its Friday of the third week of the course, and after hasty glances at the chapter(s) covered during those three weeks. They dash of som test item so tahtstudents will have something to do during the class. This is no way to approach a test. Instead, begin by taking a careful look at everything that you think yours students should “ know” or be able to “do”, based onthe material that the students are responsinle for in other words, examine the objective for the unit you are testing.
            Remember that every curriculum should have appropriatelly framed assessable objectives, that is, objectives that are stated in terms of overet performance by student. Thus, an objective that state students we learn  “tag question” or simply names the grammatical focus “tag question” is not testable. You don’t know whether students should be able to produce them orrally or in writing. Nor do you know in what context those linguisticts forms should be used. Your first task in designing a test then, is to determine appropriate objectives.
b. Drawing Up Test Specification
            test specification for classroom use can be a simple and practical outline of your test, that are intended to be widely distributed and therefore are broadly generalized, test specification are much more formal and deatailed in the unit duscussed about your specification will simply comprice (a) a broad outline of the test. (b) what skills you will test and (c) what the item will looklike.
(a) outline of the test , (b) skill to be include, because of the constraints of your curriculum, your unit test must take no more than 30 minutes. This is an integrated curriculum, so you need to test all four skills. (c) item types and tasks. The  next and potentialy more complect choices involve the item types and tasks to use in this test.
c. Devising Test Tasks
            your oral interview come first and so you draft question to the accepted pattern of oral interview. You begin and end with nonscored items (warm-up and wind-down) designed to set student at case, and then sandwich between them items intended to test the objective (level check) and a little beyond (probe).
Oral interview format
A. warm-up : question and comments
B. level  check question
            1. tell me about what you did last weekend
            2. tell me about an interesting trip you look in the last year  
            3. how didi you like the TV show we saw this week
C. probe
            1. what is your opinion about ........... ? (news event)
            2. how do you feel about .........? (another news event)
D. wind-down : comments and reasurance







d.  Designing multiple choice test item
The weakness of multiple-choice items:
1.      The technique tests only recognition knowledge
2.      Guessing may have a considerable effect on tests scores
3.      The technique severally restrictests what can be tested
4.      Washback may be harmful
5.      Cheating may be facilitated
The two principles that stand out in support of multiple-choice formates are, practicality and reliability with their predetermined correct responses and times-saving scoring procedures, multiple-choice items offerworked teachers the tempting possibility of an easy and consistent process of scoring and grading.
Since there will be occasions when multiple-choice items are appropriatte, consider the following four guidelinesfor designing multiple-choice items for both classroom based and large scale situation.
1. Design each item to measure a specifik objective
Example : where did george go after the party last night?
a.       Yes, he did
b.      Because he was tired
c.       To elain’s place  for another party
d.      Around eleven o’clock
2. State both stamp an option as simply an directly as possible
Example: My eyesight has really been deteriorating lately. I wonder if i need glasses, I think I would better go to the ........... to have my eyes checked
3. Make certain that the intended answer is clearly the only correct one.
Example: where did george go after the party last night
a.       Yes, he did
b.      Because he was tired
c.       To elain’s place for another party
d.      He went home around eleven o’clock
4. Use items in this case to accept, this card or revise items
The appropriate selectiction an arrangement of suitable multiple-choice items on a test can best be accomplished by measuring items against three indicase: items fasility, items this mination, an this tractor analysis.
1)      Items fasility is the extent which items is easy for difficult for the proposed group of test-tacers. You may wonder way that is important if in your estimation the items achiapes validity.
2)      Items this crimination (ID) is the extent to which an items differntiates between high and low ability test taccers
3)      Distractor efficiency is one more important measure of a multiple-chpice item’s value in a test, and one that is related to item this crimination
F. Scoring, Grading, and Giving Feedback
a. Scoring
Scoring is concerned with the how much or how good of language testing.We may say that we wish to draw inferences from performance on a task to the ability to manage turn taking in social interaction, and we may have designed tasks to elicit evidence, but this does not tell us how much evidence is necessary, or how much of the ability is present. How we score is the link between the evidence we elicit from the task on the one hand, and the construct and domain on the other.[10]
As you design a clasroom test, you must consider how the test will be scored and graded. Your scoring plan replects the relative weight that you place on each section and items in each section. The integrated-skills class that we have been using as an example focuses on listening and speaking skilss with sound attention to reading and writing. Three of your nine objectives target reading and writing skills hyow do you assign scoring to the various components of thi tests? [11]
Scoring is therefore very important.How we decide to score, and the values that we place upon particular scores, need careful thought. We need to convince others that the scores can be used to make inferences about learners to the knowledge, skills or abilities being tested. And we need to ensure that the use of the scores for decision making is undertaken with a full awareness of the possibility that a mistake could be made. The former concern is one of validity, and the latter one of fairness.[12]
b. Grading
You first tought might be that assigning grades to student performance to this test would be easy just give an “A for 90-100%, a “ B 80-89% and so on. Not so fastel grading is such a thomy issue that all of chapter 11 is depoted to the topic. How you asign letter grades to this test is a product of
·         The country, culture and contex of this english classroom,
·         Institutional expetatation ( most of them un written),
·         Explicit and implicit definition of grades that you have set forth,
·         The relationship you have a stablished with this class. And
·         Student expectation that have been engendered inprevious test and quizzes in this class.[13]
c. Giving Feedback
A section on scoring and grading word not be complete without some consideration of the forms and with you will offer feedback to your student, feedback the you want be came benecial was back in the example test that we have  been refering to heir-whichis is not unusual in the universe of possible formates for periodic classroom tests-consider the multitude of option. You may choose the return the test to the student with one of, or a combination of any of the possibilities below:
1.      A letter grade
2.      A total score
3.      For subscores (speaking,listening,writing,reading)
4.      For the listening and reading section
a.       An indication of correct/ incorrect responses
b.      Marginal coments
5.      For the oral interview
a.       Scores for each element being rated
b.      A ceklis of areas needing work
c.       Oral feedback after interview
d.      A post-interview conference to go over the results
6.      On the essay
a.       Scores for each element being rated
b.      A ceklis of sareas needing workl
c.       Marginal and end-of essay coments suggestionts
d.      A post-test conference to go over work
e.       A self-assesment
7.      On all or selected part of the test peer checking of result
8.      A whole-class discussion of result of the test
9.      Individual conferences with each student to review the whole test    







CHAPTER III
CLOSING
A.    Conclusion
Designing is the creation of a plan or convention for the construction of an object, system or measurable human interaction. Design has the different connotations in different fields. In some cases, the directs construction of an object ( as a pottery engineering, management, coding, and grafict design) as also considered to use design thinking.
Tests are prepared administrative procedures that occur at identifiable times in a curriculum when learner muster all their facilities to offer peak performance, knowing that their responses  are being measured and evaluated
B.     Sugestion
Based on the conclusions, this paper has many drawbacks and away from perfection, therefore all critism and conscructive suggestions so is the writer expected mainly from lecturer and fellow readers for the perfection of the future. Hopefully this paper useful for us and can add to our knowledge.


[2] Yulianus Paken Mangewa,  Jurnal Design Of Assessment For English Subject In Junior High School, 2014
[3] Thison, D;&wainer H, Test Scoring. Mahwah, (NJ: erlbaum, 2001), p.1
[4] H. Douglas Brown, Language Assessment Principles And Classroom Practices, (San Francisco State University, 2004). P. 42
[5] Ibid. P. 43
[6] Ibid. P. 44
[7] Ibid. P. 45
[8] Ibid. P. 46
[9] Ibid. P. 48
[10] Glenn Fulcher and Fred Davidson, Language Testing and Assessment An Advanced Resource book (USA and  Canada: Routledge), 2007. P. 91
[11] H. Douglas Brown, Op.cit. p. 61
[12] Glenn Fulcher and Fred Davidson, Op. Cit. P. 114
[13] H. Douglas Brown, Op.cit. p. 62

Komentar